How shared AI readiness strengthens a campus partnership
AI readiness in campus partnerships becomes critical when a collegiate recreation program operates within a P3 environment, where alignment determines whether progress accelerates or stalls. CENTERS can bring systems, people, and a mindset geared toward continuous improvement. If the institution isn’t ready to move with you, progress turns into paperwork.
That’s what makes Marshall University different.
CENTERS has made a deliberate choice to be AI-forward by using tools responsibly to streamline operations, improve communication, and keep our teams focused on service. At Marshall, that mindset isn’t treated as a threat or a distraction. It’s matched. And that shared pace is what moves a partnership from good to great.
As the Director of Campus Recreation at Marshall, I see innovation where it actually lives, in schedules, incident follow-ups, training, marketing requests, and the hundreds of small decisions our staff makes every week. The CENTERS partnership works here because it’s designed for that reality, helping us improve the everyday systems behind the scenes, so the experience on the front end stays strong, safe, and consistent.
AI Readiness in Campus Partnerships Works When the Institution Is Ready
That day-to-day focus is why Marshall’s approach to AI matters so much. At some campuses, responsible experimentation gets slowed down by uncertainty, including what tools are approved, what’s allowed, and who owns the guidance. Marshall has taken a different path. Marshall builds campus-wide AI literacy and treats AI as an institutional capability, not a side project.
In a P3 environment, that alignment is everything: it changes what the partnership can accomplish by letting staff bring ideas forward, test them quickly, and scale the ones that make the biggest difference.
See how CENTERS supports P3 campus partnerships
Marshall’s advantage isn’t that someone bought a new tool. It’s that the university is treating AI like a campus superpower, something people learn, practice, and apply with guardrails. There’s a visible front door to resources, active training happening across roles, and a clear expectation that AI use should be thoughtful, not accidental. That may sound high-level. But it shows up in very practical ways for those of us running a facility and programs every day.
A Shared Language Makes Collaboration Easier
For the CENTERS @ Marshall team, that environment changes the work experience immediately. We can move straight to asking what the right use case is, what the risk level is, and what great looks like. That shared baseline makes collaboration smoother with university partners because we’re speaking the same language around privacy, review steps, and responsible use.
The best proof of that alignment is what’s happened beyond our own walls. I’ve been asked, twice now, to help train Marshall Operations staff on practical, responsible uses of AI. That matters, because it signals something bigger than tool adoption: Marshall isn’t only trying to improve campus through AI. They’re investing in making their workforce AI-literate across roles.
And just as important, they’re looking to CENTERS to be part of how they do it. In a P3 environment, that level of trust is unique. It means the university sees us not just as the team running a facility, but as a partner with expertise worth spreading and someone who can help set a shared baseline, reduce uncertainty, and give staff confidence in what great looks like.
That’s the kind of relationship that makes improvement sustainable. When the institution isn’t holding innovation at arm’s length but rather inviting it in and asking us to help lead it, progress becomes possible at scale.
Where AI Is Making a Difference Day to Day
AI has already helped staff move faster on campus with:
Operational follow-through and documentation: A lot of our work happens after the moment: capturing what occurred, communicating what matters, and making sure it doesn’t get lost in the shuffle. AI has been useful for drafting summaries, formatting notes in consistent ways and helping us standardize language, so everyone is reading the same story. That kind of consistency makes internal handoffs cleaner and helps us focus on patterns and solutions, not rewriting or reformatting.- Training and staff development at scale: In recreation, training isn’t a one-time event. It’s ongoing. AI has helped us produce role-specific refreshers more quickly: short scenario prompts, knowledge checks, and coaching guides that supervisors can tailor. We have better tools so we can train with more consistency across shifts and across semesters, especially as student staff turnover naturally happens.
- Scheduling and daily communications: Scheduling is one of those areas where small changes make a big difference. AI has helped with the support work around schedules by creating cleaner coverage summaries and producing clearer internal messages when we need to adjust staffing or communicate changes. It reduces back-and-forth and helps us keep expectations consistent, especially during busy periods.
- Clarity in member-facing communication: AI has been helpful as a drafting partner by tightening language, simplifying complex information, and making messages easier to understand on the first read. When communication is clear, we spend less time correcting confusion and more time delivering the experience we want students and members to have.
Why This Kind of Partnership Matters
None of these are flashy. That’s the point. They’re the kinds of operational improvements that are hard to sustain in environments where AI is viewed as risky or off-limits by default. Because Marshall is treating AI like a capability with guardrails, we can use it where it fits and keep it out of places where it doesn’t.
Here’s what I would say to anyone wondering what makes an AI-forward client relationship different. It compresses the learning cycle. We can pilot, evaluate, refine, and standardize faster because the institution doesn’t force every idea back to square one.
Marshall turns the CENTERS partnership into a shared improvement engine by investing in AI literacy across roles. That’s what moves AI readiness in campus partnerships from good to great. When the university and the operator are moving at the same speed, and speaking the same language about risk, review, and responsible use, we spend less time negotiating the process and more time improving the experience.
If Marshall’s goal is a workforce that’s AI-literate from the front lines to leadership, I’m proud that campus recreation and CENTERS are part of that story. It’s a sign of trust, and it’s also a sign of where higher education is heading. The campuses that get ahead won’t be the ones that use AI the most. They’ll be the ones who use it intentionally to strengthen people, systems, and service.
About the Author